Honda Silver Wing ABS 2018 VS Yamaha X-MAX 250 2015 (Dec 2025)

Honda Silver Wing ABS 2018 VS Yamaha X-MAX 250 2015

BikeBD brings you comparison of Honda Silver Wing ABS 2018 and Yamaha X-MAX 250 2015 . The showroom price of Yamaha X-MAX 250 2015 is 0 and price of Yamaha X-MAX 250 2015 is 0 . Apart from prices, you can also find comparison of these bikes based on displacement, mileage, performance, and many more parameters. Comparison between these bikes have been carried out to help users make correct buying decision between Honda Silver Wing ABS 2018 and Yamaha X-MAX 250 2015 .

Search Bike *

Please select a valid Bike.

Search Another Bike *

Please select a valid Bike.

Honda Silver Wing ABS 2018 VS Yamaha X-MAX 250 2015 Specifications

Bike Information

Bike Name:	Honda Silver Wing ABS 2018	Yamaha X-MAX 250 2015
CC:	600	250
Regular Price:	0 BDT	0 BDT
Bike Type:	Maxi Scooter	Maxi Scooter
Distributor/Seller:
Model Year:	2018	2015
Brand Origin:	Japan	Japan
Made In:
Assemble In:

Engine

Engine Type	Twin, four-stroke	Single cylinder, four-stroke
Maximum Power	48.54	19.71
Maximum Torque	54	21
Bore	72.0 mm	69.0 mm
Stroke	71.5 mm	66.8 mm
Compression Ratio	10.2:1	10.0:1
No of Cylinders
Valves
Fuel Supply	Fuel Injection (PGM-FI)	EFI

Transmission

Transmission Type	Auto	Manual
No of Gears	0	0
Clutch Type	Automatic Clutch	Automatic Clutch

Chassis & Suspension

Chassis Type	Center backbone, steel tube
Front Suspension	41mm hydraulic fork	Telescopic fork
Rear Suspension	Swingarm with dual hydraulic shocks with five-position spring-preload adjustability	Unit swing

Brakes

Front Brake Type	Single Disc	Single Disc
Rear Brake Type	Disc Brake	Disc Brake
Front Brake Diameter
Rear Brake Diameter
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS)	Dual-Channel	Dual-Channel

Wheels & Tires

Front Tire Size	Dual-Channel	Dual-Channel
Rear Tire Size	150/70-13	140/70-14
Tubeless Tires	tubeless	tubetyre

Dimensions

Overall Length	2275 Mm
Overall Width
Height	1430 Mm
Ground Clearance
Weight	247.0 kg	178.0 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	16.00 litre	11.80 litres
Wheelbase

Electricals

Battery Type	mf	mf
Battery Voltage	12V 3Ah	12V 3Ah
Head Light	LED	LED
Tail Light	halogen	halogen
Indicators	halogen	halogen

Features

Speedometer	digital	digital
Odometer	digital	digital
RPM Meter	Analog	Digital
Handle Type	Scooter Type	Conventional
Seat Type	Single-Seat	Single-Seat
Passenger Grab Rail	yes	yes
Engine Kill Switch	yes	no

Disclaimer
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.

Compare with similar bikes

Honda Silver Wing ABS 2018

Price: 0

Honda Silver Wing GT 600 2016

Price: 0

See Compare

Honda Silver Wing GT 600 2016

Price: 0

Honda Silver Wing 2013

Price: 0

See Compare

Honda Silver Wing 2013

Price: 0

Honda Forza 750 2021

Price: 0

See Compare

Honda Forza 750 2021

Price: 0

Yamaha TMax

Price: 0

See Compare

Bike comparisons by our experts

Top Five 150cc Premium Sports Bike 2017 - Comparison Review

2017-05-31 22:02:27
Saleh

Top Five 150cc Premium Sports Bike 2017 - Comparison Review

suzuki gsx r150 vs r15 v3 vs cbr 150r

2022-01-06 01:41:00
imran

You can check out the full spec of the GSX-R150, R15 V3 and the cbr 150r.

Honda CB150R Streetfire VS Suzuki GSX-S150 Comparison Review

2017-12-03 02:10:00
Saleh

Among them Honda CB150R Streetfire & Suzuki GSX-S150 are now in position of hard competition. Both the machine featured premium hence the rivalry is on peak position between them.

r15 v3 vs rc 125 which is better

2022-01-13 03:03:00
imran

Explore Yamaha R15 V3 & KTM RC 125 specs for a thrilling ride. High-performance engines, sleek designs, and cutting-edge features await you.

Livo VS Discover 110 VS Metro Plus VS Hayate Comparison

2020-02-20 01:25:04
Arif Raihan Opu

Honda-Livo VS Discover-110 VS TVS-Metro-Plus VS Suzuki-Hayate Feature Comparison

pulsar 150 vs fz v3 difference

2022-02-02 04:51:00
imran

You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Yamaha Fz v3.