Yamaha XS 500 1977 VS Honda CBX 550 F 2 1984 (Mar 2026)

Yamaha XS 500 1977 VS Honda CBX 550 F 2 1984

BikeBD brings you comparison of Yamaha XS 500 1977 and Honda CBX 550 F 2 1984 . The showroom price of Honda CBX 550 F 2 1984 is 0 and price of Honda CBX 550 F 2 1984 is 0 . Apart from prices, you can also find comparison of these bikes based on displacement, mileage, performance, and many more parameters. Comparison between these bikes have been carried out to help users make correct buying decision between Yamaha XS 500 1977 and Honda CBX 550 F 2 1984 .

Search Bike *

Please select a valid Bike.

Search Another Bike *

Please select a valid Bike.

Yamaha XS 500 1977 VS Honda CBX 550 F 2 1984 Specifications

Bike Information

Bike Name:	Yamaha XS 500 1977	Honda CBX 550 F 2 1984
CC:	500	500
Regular Price:	0 BDT	0 BDT
Bike Type:	Standard	Standard
Distributor/Seller:
Model Year:	1977	1984
Brand Origin:	Japan	Japan
Made In:		Japan
Assemble In:

Engine

Engine Type	Twin, four-stroke	In-line four, four-stroke
Maximum Power		58.74
Maximum Torque
Bore	73.0 mm	59.2 mm
Stroke	59.6 mm	52.0 mm
Compression Ratio	8.5:1	9.5:1
No of Cylinders
Valves
Fuel Supply	carburator	Carburator

Transmission

Transmission Type	Manual	Manual
No of Gears	5	5
Clutch Type	Multiplate Wet Clutch	Info Not Available

Chassis & Suspension

Chassis Type
Front Suspension	info not Availlable	Info Not Available
Rear Suspension	info not Availlable	Info Not Available

Brakes

Front Brake Type	Single Disc	Dual Disc
Rear Brake Type	Disc Brake	Drum Brake
Front Brake Diameter
Rear Brake Diameter
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS)	No	No

Wheels & Tires

Front Tire Size	No	No
Rear Tire Size	4.00-18	4.10-18
Tubeless Tires	tubetyre	tubetyre

Dimensions

Overall Length
Overall Width
Height
Ground Clearance
Weight	210.0 kg	213.0 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	15.00 litres	18 L
Wheelbase

Electricals

Battery Type	lead-acid	lead-acid
Battery Voltage	12v	12v
Head Light	Halogen	Halogen
Tail Light	halogen	halogen
Indicators	halogen	halogen

Features

Speedometer	analog	analog
Odometer	analog	analog
RPM Meter	Analog	Analog
Handle Type	Pipe handle bar	Pipe handle bar
Seat Type	Single-Seat	Single-Seat
Passenger Grab Rail	no	yes
Engine Kill Switch	no	no

Disclaimer
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.

Compare with similar bikes

Yamaha TX 500 1973

Price: 0

Yamaha XS 500 1979

Price: 0

See Compare

Yamaha XS 500 1979

Price: 0

Yamaha XS 500 1977

Price: 0

See Compare

Yamaha XS 500 1977

Price: 0

Yamaha XS 500 1976

Price: 0

See Compare

Yamaha XS 500 1976

Price: 0

Yamaha XZ 550 1983

Price: 0

See Compare

Yamaha XZ 550 1983

Price: 0

Honda VT 500 E 1986

Price: 0

See Compare

Honda VT 500 E 1986

Price: 0

Honda XBR 500 1989

Price: 0

See Compare

Bike comparisons by our experts

Suzuki Gixxer vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

2021-06-09 06:49:00
Jahid Hasan Jojo

Suzuki Gixxer Price starts at TK. 186,950 BDT which is Rs. 12,372 costlier than base model of TVS Apache RTR 160 4V priced atTk. 167,300 BDT. In technical specifications, Suzuki Gixxer is powered by 155 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by 159.7 cc engine.

Scooter vs Moped - Differences & Similarities

2019-06-25 01:35:22
Arif Raihan Opu

Scooter vs Moped - Differences & Similarities

Hornet-ABS VS FZS-ABS VS NS160-ABS Feature Comparison Review

2020-02-08 01:15:00
Arif Raihan Opu

Choosing between Honda CB Hornet 160R-ABS, Yamaha FZS-FI V3 ABS, and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI ABS in Bangladesh is a tough call. This review highlights key features for informed decisions.

Hero Thriller 160R Refresh VS Yamaha XSR 155

2023-06-21 06:56:00
Rafi Kabir

Hero Thriller 160R Refresh and the Yamaha XSR 155 cater to different preferences and riding styles.

Top Five 125cc Bikes in Bangladesh 2017

2017-10-19 22:00:11
Saleh

Top Five 125cc Bikes in Bangladesh 2017

Yamaha YZF R15 Version 2.0 VS Version 3.0 Comparison Review

2017-08-01 03:17:47
Saleh

Yamaha YZF R15 Version 2.0 VS Version 3.0 Comparison Review