Triumph Tracker 400 VS Lifan KPM Cafe 200 4V
Triumph Tracker 400 VS Lifan KPM Cafe 200 4V Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
400 |
200 |
|
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
0 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Cafe Racer |
Cafe Racer |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
|
|
|
Brand Origin: |
|
China |
|
Made In: |
|
|
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
|
Vertical single-cylinder, four-valve, water cooled, four-stroke |
|
Maximum Power |
41 |
20.12 |
|
Maximum Torque |
37.5 |
17.5 |
|
Bore |
89 mm |
65.5 mm |
|
Stroke |
64.0 mm |
58.8 mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
12.0:1 |
11.5:1 |
|
No of Cylinders |
1 |
1 |
|
Valves |
4 |
4 Valve |
|
Fuel Supply |
|
EFI |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Manual |
|
No of Gears |
6 |
6 |
|
Clutch Type |
Wet-multiplate |
Wet-multiplate |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
Hybrid spine/perimeter tubular steel. |
|
|
Front Suspension |
43mm Showa Big Piston inverted forks (140mm travel). |
Telescopic USD |
|
Rear Suspension |
: Gas-charged monoshock with external reservoir, preload adjustable (130mm travel). |
Monoshock |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Single Disc |
Disc Brake |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Disc Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
|
|
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
1 |
1 |
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
Dual-Channel |
Dual-Channel |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
Dual-Channel |
Dual-Channel |
|
Rear Tire Size |
|
130/70-17 |
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubeless |
tubeless |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
|
2040 mm |
|
Overall Width |
|
745 mm |
|
Height |
|
1115 mm |
|
Ground Clearance |
|
|
|
Weight |
173.0 kg |
151 kg |
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
|
13L |
|
Wheelbase |
|
1345 mm |
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
mf |
mf |
|
Battery Voltage |
Info Not Available |
12v |
|
Head Light |
LED |
LED |
|
Tail Light |
led |
led |
|
Indicators |
led |
led |
Features
|
Speedometer |
digital |
digital |
|
Odometer |
digital |
digital |
|
RPM Meter |
Digital |
Digital |
|
Handle Type |
Info Not Available |
Three part handle bar |
|
Seat Type |
Single-Seat |
Single-Seat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
yes |
no |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
yes |
yes |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Bike comparisons by our experts
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review
-
2019-10-03 07:01:36 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.
Yamaha R15 V.1 vs Yamaha R15 V.2
-
2012-12-03 21:00:16 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha R15 V.1 vs Yamaha R15 V.2
Yamaha RX 115 to Yamaha R15 v.2 : The Yamaha Revolution
-
2013-02-05 10:27:11 -
Shuvo
It is a Yamaha RX 115 which I personally think is one of best bike that ever touched the tarmac of Bengal. Debuted n 1981 & was into production for 20 year
Livo VS Discover 110 VS Metro Plus VS Hayate Comparison
-
2020-02-20 01:25:04 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Honda-Livo VS Discover-110 VS TVS-Metro-Plus VS Suzuki-Hayate Feature Comparison
Honda Livo 110 VS Hero Splendor iSmart 110 Comparison Review
-
2017-11-23 00:23:57 -
Saleh
Honda Livo 110 VS Hero Splendor iSmart 110 Comparison Review
Hero Honda Hunk vs Yamaha FZs
-
2013-09-12 00:20:33 -
Shuvo
Hero Honda HUNK while the other is Yamaha FZS. Hunk has been one of people choice these days prefer FZS.So let’s get on with Hero Honda Hunk vs Yamaha FZs
