KTM RC 160 VS Honda CBF1000 ABS (2010)
KTM RC 160 VS Honda CBF1000 ABS (2010) Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
160 |
1000 |
|
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
0 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Sports |
Sports |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
|
2010 |
|
Brand Origin: |
|
|
|
Made In: |
|
|
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
|
In-line four, four-stroke |
|
Maximum Power |
18.73 |
94.54 |
|
Maximum Torque |
15.5 |
97 |
|
Bore |
|
|
|
Stroke |
|
|
|
Compression Ratio |
11.97 : 1 |
|
|
No of Cylinders |
1 |
4 |
|
Valves |
4 |
4 |
|
Fuel Supply |
|
Injection |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Manual |
|
No of Gears |
6 |
6 |
|
Clutch Type |
Info Not Available |
Info Not Available |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
Info Not Available |
|
|
Front Suspension |
Inverted Telescopic Fork, 37mm dia |
41 mm cartridge-type telescopic fork, 120 mm axle travel |
|
Rear Suspension |
Double rate, Canister Mono shox.- 6 steps (Adjuster Slots) |
Pro-Link with gas-charges HMAS damper, 120 mm axle travel |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Single Disc |
Dual Disc |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Disc Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
|
240 Mm |
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
1 |
4 |
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
Dual-Channel |
No |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
Dual-Channel |
No |
|
Rear Tire Size |
|
160/60-ZR17 |
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubeless |
tubeless |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
|
2176 Mm |
|
Overall Width |
|
827 Mm |
|
Height |
|
1175 Mm |
|
Ground Clearance |
168 Mm |
135 Mm |
|
Weight |
155.0 kg |
228.0 kg |
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
13.7 litres |
19.00 Litres |
|
Wheelbase |
1347 Mm |
1483 Mm |
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
mf |
Info-Not-Available |
|
Battery Voltage |
Info Not Available |
Info Not Available |
|
Head Light |
LED |
LED |
|
Tail Light |
led |
led |
|
Indicators |
led |
led |
Features
|
Speedometer |
digital |
digital |
|
Odometer |
digital |
digital |
|
RPM Meter |
Digital |
Digital |
|
Handle Type |
Info Not Available |
Pipe handle bar |
|
Seat Type |
Split-Seat |
Split-Seat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
no |
no |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
yes |
no |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Compare with similar bikes
Bike comparisons by our experts
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review
-
2019-10-03 07:01:36 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.
Yamaha R15 V3 VS Suzuki GSX-R150 VS Honda CBR150R Comparison Review
-
2017-10-13 20:27:52 -
Saleh
Yamaha R15 V3 VS Suzuki GSX-R150 VS Honda CBR150R Comparison Review
Honda CD80 VS Runner AD80S Comparison Review
-
2017-09-21 04:54:53 -
Saleh
Honda CD80 and Runner AD80S, both classic 80cc bikes in Bangladesh, offer distinct features. CD80 emphasizes efficiency and longevity, while AD80S blends power, speed, and style. The choice depends on individual preferences and priorities.
pulsar 150 vs tvs raider 125 comparison
-
2022-02-24 03:19:00 -
imran
You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Tvs raider 125.
r15 v3 vs r15 v4 comparison
-
2022-02-10 03:07:00 -
imran
You can check out the full specs of both the r15 v3 and the r15 v4 model
r15 v3 vs rc 125 which is better
-
2022-01-13 03:03:00 -
imran
Explore Yamaha R15 V3 & KTM RC 125 specs for a thrilling ride. High-performance engines, sleek designs, and cutting-edge features await you.
.jpg.jpeg)